Hi all,
Situation:
- One company
- Two departments responsible for managing different (separate) types o cases from customers (like: one department responsible for cars repairs, second for building roads)
- Both departments CAN (but don't have to) work with the same set of customers (like: customer wants to repair a car and have a new road)
- Very often one department asks second for help / opinion (like: If we build that road like that, will it break that car?)
My question:
What's the best way to implement it? I've got only two ideas (maybe you've got sth better...)
1 idea:
- Implement 2 OTRS systems, totally independent
Pros:
- Easy
- Total separation of cases (In case I don't want car department to see data used by road department)
Cons:
- Interaction between two OTRS systems will produce strange e-mail with loooong Subject (2 OTRS tickets, text, possible 3rd party external Ticket....)
2 idea:
- Implement 1 OTRS system for both departments
Pros:
- Great workflow controll
- Only one system
- Shared customer DB
Cons:
- Lots of configuration
- Lots of possibilities to make a mistake
- I don't even know, if OTRS has enough of options around Agent permission to queues / tickets to do that
What do you think?
Regards,
Tola
2 x OTRS - interaction - implementation
Moderator: crythias
Re: 2 x OTRS - interaction - implementation
I would definitely recommend the second idea! It's the only way in my opinion.
Re: 2 x OTRS - interaction - implementation
Any suggestions on how to design privilege model in two department scenario? ACLs? Groups?
Any baseline suggestions?
Hilfe!!!
Any baseline suggestions?
Hilfe!!!
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 4005
- Joined: 18 Dec 2007, 12:23
- Znuny Version: Znuny and Znuny LTS
- Real Name: Roy Kaldung
- Company: Znuny
- Contact:
Re: 2 x OTRS - interaction - implementation
There is not enough information. I suggest that permission are the first topic you should work on.
Department A => Queue A => Group A
Department B => Queue B => Group B
This results in permissions for an agent from A: Group A rw, Group B move_into and vice versa
Department A => Queue A => Group A
Department B => Queue B => Group B
This results in permissions for an agent from A: Group A rw, Group B move_into and vice versa
Znuny and Znuny LTS running on CentOS / RHEL / Debian / SLES / MySQL / PostgreSQL / Oracle / OpenLDAP / Active Directory / SSO
Use a test system - always.
Do you need professional services? Check out https://www.znuny.com/
Do you want to contribute or want to know where it goes ?
Use a test system - always.
Do you need professional services? Check out https://www.znuny.com/
Do you want to contribute or want to know where it goes ?
-
- Znuny wizard
- Posts: 381
- Joined: 20 Sep 2010, 16:54
- Znuny Version: OTRS 6 CE
- Real Name: Alexey Yusov
- Company: Radiant System Group s.r.o
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
Re: 2 x OTRS - interaction - implementation
Yes!tola91 wrote:2 idea:
- Implement 1 OTRS system for both departments
and more PROs ....tola91 wrote:Pros:
- Great workflow controll
- Only one system
- Shared customer DB
Cons:
I disagree especially in comparison with the "Idea 1"- Lots of configuration
Why? You just need to create clear processes for ticket categorization and routing- Lots of possibilities to make a mistake
OTRS provides provides flexible configuration for role or group based access to tickets and options.- I don't even know, if OTRS has enough of options around Agent permission to queues / tickets to do that
Alexey Yusov
Production: OTRS CE ITSM 6.0.28 on CentOS 7 + Apache 2.4 + MariaDB 10.4.13 + Radiant Customer Portal
Radiant System OTRS Intergrator
RS4OTRS marketplace
Stay tuned on our Facebook
((OTRS)) Community Edition - what next?
Production: OTRS CE ITSM 6.0.28 on CentOS 7 + Apache 2.4 + MariaDB 10.4.13 + Radiant Customer Portal
Radiant System OTRS Intergrator
RS4OTRS marketplace
Stay tuned on our Facebook
((OTRS)) Community Edition - what next?