[SOLVED] Clarification on Switching Ticket Backend Docs

Moderator: crythias

Locked
interploy
Znuny newbie
Posts: 30
Joined: 24 Sep 2012, 21:10
Znuny Version: 3.2.3

[SOLVED] Clarification on Switching Ticket Backend Docs

Post by interploy »

Hello,

I just wanted to get some clarification on the performance tuning documentation about switching ticket index backends.

Reference: http://otrs.github.io/doc/manual/admin/ ... uning.html

My OTRS database is getting fairly large (a sql dump file is 9.6GB). The ticket table is getting close to passing 77,000 rows. I see in the documentation that it recommends switching backends from Kernel::System::Ticket::IndexAccelerator::RuntimeDB (what I have currently) over to Kernel::System::Ticket::IndexAccelerator::StaticDB when OTRS has more than 80,000 open tickets.

My question is this: When the documentation states 80k open tickets, is it referring to actual open tickets (as in, being actively worked on) or the total number of tickets in the system (77k in this case)? For all of the tickets in the database, users typically only have around 100-150 tickets actively being worked on at any given time. The rest are closed, but are used in reports.

Thanks for any insight,
-interploy
Last edited by interploy on 12 Nov 2014, 17:02, edited 1 time in total.
OTRS v3.2.3
CentOS 6.3
PostgreSQL 8.4.13
crythias
Moderator
Posts: 10170
Joined: 04 May 2010, 18:38
Znuny Version: 5.0.x
Location: SouthWest Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: Clarification on Switching Ticket Backends Documentation

Post by crythias »

I could be wrong, but I would take it to mean open ever, or just *tickets*.
OTRS 6.0.x (private/testing/public) on Linux with MySQL database.
Please edit your signature to include your OTRS version, Operating System, and database type.
Click Subscribe Topic below to get notifications. Consider amending your topic title to include [SOLVED] if it is so.
Need help? Before you ask
interploy
Znuny newbie
Posts: 30
Joined: 24 Sep 2012, 21:10
Znuny Version: 3.2.3

Re: Clarification on Switching Ticket Backends Documentation

Post by interploy »

crythias wrote:I could be wrong, but I would take it to mean open ever, or just *tickets*.
That's where I was leaning, but I wanted to make sure. I've lost count of the number of times I've bungled code because of an assumption. :lol:

Thanks for the input!
OTRS v3.2.3
CentOS 6.3
PostgreSQL 8.4.13
dim3nsi0n
Znuny newbie
Posts: 11
Joined: 22 Feb 2016, 14:54
Znuny Version: 3.3.7

Re: [SOLVED] Clarification on Switching Ticket Backend Docs

Post by dim3nsi0n »

Hello,

I'm a newbie as well :)
Even though the ticket is marked as SOLVED I am still confused.... :?
We have around 100k tickets in our database but less than 6000 open tickets the rest are closed or archived. Should we use StaticDB or RuntimeDB?

Thank you!
Andrei
interploy
Znuny newbie
Posts: 30
Joined: 24 Sep 2012, 21:10
Znuny Version: 3.2.3

Re: [SOLVED] Clarification on Switching Ticket Backend Docs

Post by interploy »

dim3nsi0n wrote:Hello,

I'm a newbie as well :)
Even though the ticket is marked as SOLVED I am still confused.... :?
We have around 100k tickets in our database but less than 6000 open tickets the rest are closed or archived. Should we use StaticDB or RuntimeDB?

Thank you!
Andrei

Hi Andrei,

To clarify, the documentation is referring the to the total number of tickets in the database and not just the ones that are currently active. At 100k entries, you should consider switching the backend to StaticDB if you see your system's performance start suffering.

Hope that helps,
-interploy
OTRS v3.2.3
CentOS 6.3
PostgreSQL 8.4.13
dim3nsi0n
Znuny newbie
Posts: 11
Joined: 22 Feb 2016, 14:54
Znuny Version: 3.3.7

Re: [SOLVED] Clarification on Switching Ticket Backend Docs

Post by dim3nsi0n »

Thank you so much for your quick answer!
Locked